Which Supreme Court case established the admissibility of photographs in place of original documents?

The case that established the admissibility of photographs in place of original documents is Luco v. US. This decision set a vital precedent regarding the use of reproductions in legal contexts, particularly how photographs can serve as valid evidence when the original documents may be lost or unavailable. The underlying principle is rooted in ensuring that courts can still consider relevant information without being hindered by the absence of physical originals, thereby enhancing the efficiency of legal proceedings.

In contrast, the other cases mentioned focus on different legal principles or rights. Marbury v. Madison is primarily known for establishing the principle of judicial review. Brown v. Board of Education is a landmark case that dealt with racial segregation in public schools. Miranda v. Arizona is famous for ensuring the rights of detained individuals, particularly the requirement to inform them of their rights. Each of these cases, while significant in their respective contexts, does not pertain to the admissibility of photographs as evidence.